Discussion about this post

User's avatar
sam van's avatar

I know some people whom are being hounded by creditors, due to no fault of their own making. I would like to present these arguments, as they are being sued by the 'bank.' I would like to say that there is no injured party. The bank did not loan any actual monies it received from real persons. The bank created monies, from a claim of fractional reserves. The monies did not exist before, were simply created out of thin air, there for there is no injured party. The bank did not lose any actual monies.

--

I wish this argument would work at the present time. At most, I would want the judge to rule on many elements, and approve one of the many. Your thoughts?

Expand full comment
Utopian Fool's avatar

There was a historical case where a US judge ruled exactly that, as the bank could not prove that they had actually provided a "consideration" when "offering" the defendant his mortgage. Needless to say, the aforementioned judge subsequently met with an early demise...

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts